I have what I consider to be a fairly typical high-end consumer-level local network. Aside from a NAT router, the network contains two gigabit switches, two 10/100 switches, several Apple Airport Express units, and a few other odds and ends. I don't need wireless much, since the premises are wired, but it is convenient for laptops (less docking effort), guests, and a few other occasional uses.
Ars Technica has a good review of the new Apple Airport Extreme (draft) 802.11n wireless router (though I would have liked more detail on access control features). It's a nice form-factor, fully-featured, and of course has Apple's ease of use. Though this is a tempting option, I have yet to find a consumer-level router that really meets all of my needs well. For several years, I used an Asante FR3004C Cable/DSL Router, which was very stable and had some nice, but limited, access control features. I briefly tried a Linksys BEFSX41, but returned it almost immediately because it was very unstable and it was very quirky and limited in how it implemented some features that I wanted.
I recently switched to a D-Link DGL-4300 wireless "108G" gaming router. Though I don't really need many of the gaming aspects of it, I liked the gigabit switch (makes it easier to interconnect my gigabit-capable computers), and it does have some interesting advertised features. The wireless access is nice, but not strictly necessary, though it does give some added range to my wireless access. The D-Link DGL-4300 has some nice access control features, but like the Asante FR3004C, they are limited. My biggest complaint with the DGL-4300 is its instability. I've had to work around (access control) and even not use certain advertised features because they are so buggy or just plain don't work, and too frequently I have to reboot it because it gets into a mode where it doesn't operate properly. D-Link customer service is pretty much non-existent, an extremely frustrating experience. And unfortunately the documentation, like that of the Linksys, doesn't describe the features in enough detail to make an informed decision about whether the router will meet needs. There's not much choice but to buy it and experiment. Reviews aren't much help either, the reviewers are too enamored of the "cool" Flash banner at the top of the administration window (which of course I block in Firefox anyway with the Flashblock extension) to delve into the features.
Since I still have a mix of 802.11b and 802.11g devices, I'm not even sure yet how I'd configure my network if I were to find a suitable (draft) 802.11n router. 802.11b (11Mbps max) is pretty painful these days for all but simple surfing and email. 802.11g (54Mbps max) is fine for many uses, but at typically less than half the speed of old-fashioned 10/100 Ethernet, it's still slow for large transfers. Even 802.11n is still typically much slower than wired gigabit, but as with many modern technologies, the public generally allows convenience to trump function. Needless to say, I'm always in the market for a new router. I'm not really holding my breath. I'd like to buy an appliance that just works, but maybe I'll have to bite the bullet and either get an open model that I can reprogram with a custom feature set, or set up a dedicated server to operate as a NAT router.